One screen. Every answer.
Annotated chart, weighted confluence score and a risk-sized trade plan — together, live, with every claim traceable to the candle that produced it.
No tab-switching. The reason it fits is that one engine produced all five.
It's already running. Change the symbol.
Toggle any layer to see what the read depends on. Hover a line of the thesis and the chart spotlights the evidence behind it.
Weighing eight confluence factors…
Sample market data here so the read stays stable enough to compare across visits — and every plan shown passes a coherence check before it renders. Inside the app the same engine runs on live prices.
Four panes, one argument
The layout is the thesis: evidence on the left, the weighing of it on the right, and nothing hidden behind a tab you have to know exists.
The evidence canvas
Six independent layers — structure, risk levels, order blocks, fair value gaps, liquidity and volume. Each can be switched off. If you think fair value gaps are noise, turn them off and see what the read looks like without them; the engine will tell you honestly.
The confluence panel
A 0–100 score with all eight weighted factors broken out beneath it, so a high number is never just a number. Conflicts subtract rather than being quietly excluded, which is why a strong setup in a bad location reads in the eighties.
The trade plan
Entry, invalidation, both targets and the risk-to-reward, with position size derived from the stop against your account. Copy it as a formatted block straight into a journal, a Discord or a broker ticket.
The cited thesis
Four numbered claims, each pointing at a marker on the chart. Hover one and everything else dims. This is the part that separates analysis from prose: you can check every sentence against the drawing it came from.
What it does, and what it doesn't
Including the rows we lose. A comparison table where one column wins everything is an advertisement, and you already know that.
| Capability | ORIN | TradingView | General AI |
|---|---|---|---|
Charting and drawing tools TradingView wins outright — it is a charting platform and we are not pretending otherwise. | |||
Reads the chart for you A general model will describe a chart; it infers levels rather than measuring them. | |||
Every level traceable to the data The difference between analysis and plausible-sounding prose. | |||
Weighted score, every factor shown Indicators are available everywhere; a weighted synthesis you can audit line by line is not. | |||
Complete risk-sized trade plan Entry, invalidation, targets and size derived from the stop. | |||
Published accuracy record Confidence claims checked against outcomes, published either way. | |||
Order execution ORIN never places an order. Deliberate, not missing. | |||
Real-time streaming data Snapshot on scan, not a tick stream. Honest about the difference. |
Read the bottom two rows first. ORIN does not execute and does not stream ticks — if those are what you need, you need a broker and a charting terminal, and you should keep using them. The Studio is for the part between seeing a chart and deciding what to do about it.
Symbol to decision in under a minute
The same five steps every time, which is the point — a repeatable process is the thing that survives a bad week.
Choose a symbol and timeframe
Any ticker across five asset classes. The higher timeframes are read as context whether or not you look at them.
Read the annotated chart
Six layers, each toggleable. Structure first, because a signal means the opposite thing in an uptrend and a downtrend.
Check the score, then the conflicts
The number is the summary; the family breakdown underneath is the actual information. Look for what disagrees.
Trace the reasoning
Hover each claim and confirm the chart supports it. If a claim does not survive that check, the setup should not survive it either.
Take the plan or pass
Entry, invalidation and size, ready to copy. Passing is a logged decision too — which is how you find out whether your passes were right.
The studio's own scoreboard
A workspace that produces confidence numbers owes you the record of how those numbers resolved.
Two of these are dashes because the resolved sample is not yet large enough for a number to mean anything, and publishing one anyway is the exact behaviour that makes every competing accuracy claim worthless. The other two are counts, which we can state today.
See the full calibration pageWho ends up living in this screen
You have six tabs open and one decision to make
Charting in one, an indicator script in another, a position calculator in a third, a journal in a fourth. The studio collapses that into one screen — not because fewer tabs is inherently better, but because the decision is faster when the evidence and the risk maths are in the same field of view.
Chart, score, plan, size and thesis in a single workspace.
You've been told AI reads charts and you don't believe it
Correct instinct. The test is whether the tool can show you why. Toggle a layer off and watch what changes; hover a claim and see whether the chart actually supports it. A tool that cannot survive that inspection should not get your money.
Every thesis line cites an annotation; every layer can be switched off.
Your constraint is drawdown, not conviction
Size comes from the stop, so the dollar risk stays fixed however wide the invalidation sits. Apply a firm rule pack and the plan is sized against the daily loss limit instead of your preference, with the headroom stated in losses rather than percentages.
Rule packs cap size by published evaluation limits.
What the Studio is not
A workspace this dense invites the assumption that it does more than it does. It is worth being precise about the edges.
It is not a charting platform
There are no drawing tools, no custom indicators and no script editor. Draw your own trendlines in TradingView; ORIN reads the same symbol off real candles and gives you a second opinion that never saw your lines.
It is not a live tick feed
A scan is a snapshot taken when you run it, not a stream. For a fast-moving intraday chart, re-scan before acting on a read that is minutes old — the timestamp is shown for exactly this reason.
It does not execute
No broker connection, no automation, no one-click trading. You carry the plan to your own platform. This is the single most-requested feature and it is deliberately unbuilt.
It cannot see the news
Earnings, a central bank, a headline that has not hit the tape yet — none of it is in the price data. A high grade the night before earnings is a high grade on a coin flip.
The studio compresses the mechanical part of analysis and hands the judgement back to you with the evidence attached. That is a genuinely useful thing and a strictly smaller thing than “AI that trades for you” — if that is what you are shopping for, we are not it, and the people selling it to you should be asked for their calibration record.
Questions traders actually ask
A single workspace where the chart, the confluence score and the trade plan sit side by side. You pick a symbol, the engine reads structure, levels and order flow, and the annotated chart, the score and a risk-managed plan appear together — with every claim traceable to something drawn on the chart.
TradingView is a charting platform you bring analysis to. The Studio brings the analysis: it reads the chart and produces a graded setup with an entry, an invalidation and the reasoning. They are complementary — many traders use TradingView to execute and the Studio to decide.
Explained. Every line of the thesis points at a specific annotation on the chart — hover it and the chart spotlights the evidence. You can also switch any overlay layer off and see what the read looks like without it, which is not something a black box can offer.
No. The studio on this page runs free with no signup. An account adds saved analyses, a journal that records your decisions, watchlists that re-scan, and your own calibration curve built from your resolved outcomes.
Stocks and ETFs, forex, crypto, commodities and indices, on 15-minute through daily timeframes. Crypto works signed out; stocks and FX run on our data feed and need a free account. The higher timeframes are always read as context for the one you selected.
Yes. Rule packs install a codified methodology as the grading lens, so your chart is graded against that rulebook rule by rule — including rules you write yourself. Each pack publishes its own record, including when it reads badly.
No. There is no broker connection and no automation anywhere in ORIN. It produces analysis, a bias and a scenario plan; you carry that to your own platform. That gap is deliberate — the decision, and the responsibility for it, stay with you.