Analyze your trading chart free.
A graded verdict with the levels, the invalidation price and a full trade plan — in about the time it takes to draw one trendline. Crypto runs with no account at all.
Complete verdict, levels, invalidation and trade plan — the demo read holds nothing back. Resets tomorrow.
- A graded verdict — take it, or don’t
- The levels the read is built on
- Where the idea is wrong
- Entry, stop, targets and the R:R
- The reasoning, in writing
Everything the read returns, and what Pro adds.
The engine output below is complete — verdict, levels, invalidation, plan and reasoning on every tier. Two dials on top of it, the calibrated confidence and the confluence score, are shown with Pro on account reads; the demo shows the lot.
A verdict, not a vibe
A 0–100 confluence score resolved into a plain grade, with the direction it applies to. Nine weighted factors decide it across every timeframe the engine can read — and a low grade is a real output, not a failure to find something nice to say.
How the score is builtThe levels it is built on
Support, resistance and structure measured off real candles for the symbol and timeframe you chose. Every level shown is one the read actually used, so you can disagree with a specific number rather than with the conclusion in general.
Where the idea is wrong
The invalidation price, stated before the entry. A tool that tells you what to buy and not what would prove it wrong has given you half a trade, and it is the half that costs money.
A plan you can act on
Entry zone, stop, targets and the risk-to-reward that falls out of them — plus the size the stop implies at your risk percentage. Formatted to paste into a journal or a broker ticket without retyping anything.
Inside the trade planThe reasoning, in writing
Each line of the thesis points at the annotation it came from, so you can follow the argument back to the chart. This is the part that makes a read arguable — and a read you cannot argue with is one you cannot learn from.
And a refusal, when it is right
If the data is thin, the timeframes disagree hard, or the structure is unreadable, the engine says so instead of manufacturing a grade. Free tools rarely refuse. That is a product decision, not a technical limit.
Three steps, about thirty seconds
No onboarding, no questionnaire, no card. The first read happens before anything asks who you are.
Open the grader
Type the symbol you actually trade
Argue with the reasoning
What “free” means here, exactly
Three tiers of access, with the boundary stated before you spend anything on finding it.
- Crypto symbols, live candles
- Complete verdict and trade plan
- No card, no email, no timer
- The read is saved for you if you sign up later
Crypto is free for us to serve, so it is free for you.
- Stocks, ETFs and forex unlocked
- Reads saved to your journal
- Screenshot uploads included
- Still no card
Equities and FX are metered by our data vendor, which is why they sit behind a login rather than a paywall.
- A higher daily allowance
- The confidence and confluence dials
- Alerts and rule packs
The verdict, levels, plan and reasoning are never paywalled, and no number is blurred over — what Pro adds is shown as Pro, plainly. If a competitor smudges the answer and calls it a preview, that is still the difference.
Every number above is the same constant the server enforces — the page cannot advertise an allowance the API would refuse. Full pricing.
Who a free read is actually for
Same engine, three different reasons to run it before paying for anything.
The path with no login at all
Majors and liquid alts run on live exchange candles without an account, so you can test the engine against a chart you already have an opinion on. Bring one you have already decided about — agreement proves nothing, and the disagreements are where you find out whether this is worth anything.
Runs on the keyless exchange feed the public scanner uses.
One free account, no card
Equities, ETFs and FX need a login because the vendor meters those quotes per call. That is the entire reason — not a growth tactic dressed as one. Signing up takes a moment and does not ask for payment details at any point.
The read you ran before signing up is adopted into the account.
Check a setup against the rules that fail you
Most evaluations end on a loss-limit breach rather than a missed target, so the useful question before a trade is what it risks, not what it might make. The free read gives you the invalidation and the R:R first — which is the number your drawdown cares about.
Position sizing and prop-firm presets are free and unmetered.
What a free read is not
Stated here rather than discovered later. A tool that only advertises its strengths has told you nothing you can plan around.
It is not a prediction
A grade describes the structure in front of it — confluence, location, momentum, the quality of the setup as it stands. It does not know what happens next, and any number offered as a probability of profit on this page would be invented.
It is not personal advice
The same chart at the same moment returns the same read for everyone. Nothing is tailored to your account, your holdings or your risk profile — deliberately, and permanently. Whether the trade suits you is a question the engine is not built to answer.
It has no published win rate yet
The calibration page shows how graded setups have actually resolved, and the resolved sample is still too small to publish a figure. It says so rather than filling the gap with something more flattering. Check it before you trust the grade.
Coverage is limited by data
If clean candles for a symbol cannot be fetched, the read is refused rather than approximated. Illiquid tickers, unusual venues and some exotic pairs will simply not resolve, and that is the correct outcome.
Screenshots are the weaker path
Reading levels off an image is harder than reading them off data, and general-purpose AI is confidently wrong at it. Typing the symbol is better whenever it is possible, and the screenshot layer states its own limits on its own page.
None of that makes a free read less useful — it makes it a second opinion with its boundaries drawn. The engine does the measuring; you keep the decision, and the risk that comes with it. Read the calibration record before you rely on any of it.
Questions traders actually ask
Yes, and with no card. A visitor with no account gets a full crypto read per day — the complete verdict, levels, invalidation and trade plan, with nothing held back. A free account raises the daily allowance and opens stocks, ETFs and forex; on account reads, two dials — the calibrated confidence and confluence scores — are part of Pro, and the grade beside them is identical either way. Nothing on this page is a trial that starts billing you later.
On crypto, yes — go straight to the grader, type a symbol like BTC-USD, and the engine runs on live candles. Stocks, ETFs and forex sit behind a free account for a boring reason we would rather state than hide: our market-data vendor meters those quotes and we pay per call, so open access to them would be a bill rather than a feature.
A graded verdict, the support and resistance levels the read is built on, the price that invalidates it, a full trade plan with entry, stop, targets and the resulting risk-to-reward, and the written reasoning behind all of it. The engine and the grade are identical on every tier. On free-account reads the two scored dials — calibrated confidence and the 0–100 confluence — are shown with Pro; the no-account demo shows everything.
Ours publishes its own record rather than claiming a number: the calibration page shows how graded setups have actually resolved, and it currently reads as still collecting because the resolved sample is too small to support a figure. Any tool in this category quoting a win rate without a sample size and a method is quoting marketing. Treat a grade as a structured second opinion, not a forecast.
No — typing the symbol is the better path, because the engine then measures levels off real candle data instead of inferring them from pixels. Screenshot reading exists for charts we cannot fetch, and the honest state of that layer is documented on its own page rather than oversold here.
Crypto across the major USD pairs, plus stocks, ETFs and forex once you have a free account. Coverage is limited by what real candle data we can fetch for a symbol — if the engine cannot get clean data, it refuses the read instead of guessing, which is a feature you will only appreciate the first time it happens.
It comes with you. The read you produced before signing up is adopted into your account and lands in your journal exactly as you saw it — grade, levels and reasoning intact. Losing the first thing you did as the price of registering would be a strange way to ask for a signup.
No. ORIN produces impersonal analysis of an instrument you chose: the same chart at the same moment returns the same read for every user, and nothing is tailored to your holdings, balance or risk profile. It does not place orders and has no broker connection. It is decision support — the judgement, and the trade, stay yours.