Short answer
Open the thesis panel and hover each claim — every line points at a specific annotation on the chart. If a claim is not supported by what it points at, that is a real disagreement worth recording.
Steps
- 1Trace the claimsEach thesis line cites a marker. Hover it and the chart spotlights the evidence behind that sentence.
- 2Check the layersToggle overlays off one at a time to see which signal the read depends on. A grade resting entirely on one layer is a weaker grade.
- 3Check the timestampA scan is a snapshot from when you ran it. On fast intraday charts, re-scan before acting on a read that is minutes old.
- 4Record the disagreementThe feedback control on the verdict panel logs it against that specific analysis. It lands in your own record on Edge, where you can read your notes back, and it is counted toward a platform disagreement rate that publishes once enough reads have been marked. It never changes the grade in front of you — the engine decides from measurements, and a disagreement is an opinion about one.
Worth knowing
- Disagreeing with a grade is a legitimate outcome. The engine reads one chart at a time and cannot see your exposure, your thesis or the news.
Related
What the grade and confluence score mean
The confluence score is a weighted read of nine factors — setup quality, trend alignment, multi-timeframe agreement, reward:risk, entry location, volume confirmation, momentum, structural confirmation and volatility regime — across three fetched timeframes, expressed 0–100. The letter is a band of that score: 90+ is A+, 80–89 A, 70–79 B, 60–69 C, 50–59 D, below 50 F.
Can ORIN analyse a chart screenshot?
Yes, in two modes on the Upload page. A measured read takes only the ticker and timeframe off your image and grades that market's real candles. The Upload beta lets a model read the picture itself and give its own levels — inferred, never graded, and never counted in any published figure.