Trade it the way it's taught.
Your favourite methodology, codified into rules ORIN checks on every chart — with a public track record for every pack, computed from resolved outcomes and left empty until there are some. No mythology. Receipts.
Empty, on purpose. No pack shows a number until 500 resolved setups sit behind it — and then it shows whichever way it lands.
One chart. Two rulebooks.
Flip the switch and watch the grade change. A pack is not a filter on the same score — it is a different set of rules, and it can cap a setup the platform likes.
Same chart, same candles. One rulebook, then another.
Structure, volume and order flow agree. Location is the weak leg.
Sample One fixed chart, read twice. The rules and their weights are the shipped pack's own; the score, the grade and how this chart met each rule are a worked example.
The platform's own weighting: eight factors, these weights. Flip the switch to grade the same chart against a codified methodology instead.
Note what happened to the grade. A pack that could only ever agree with the platform would be decoration — this one caps the setup because the rulebook says out-of-session ends it.
Apply a pack freeA fixed sample chart so the two verdicts stay comparable. The rules and their citations are read from the shipped pack, so a rule the engine does not apply cannot appear here.
Packs, and what each one has earned
Three tiers, with the naming grammar enforced: nothing claims endorsement it hasn't got — and nothing claims a record it hasn't earned.
TJR AI
OfficialSession Liquidity Model · codified with TJR
ICT AI
OfficialInstitutional Order Flow · codified with ICT
Mark Minervini AI
OfficialStage 2 Momentum · codified with Mark Minervini
Qullamaggie AI
OfficialEpisodic Pivot Breakout · codified with Qullamaggie
Al Brooks AI
OfficialPrice Action Trend Continuation · codified with Al Brooks
From “I follow his stuff” to “I follow it correctly”
The disciple's actual problem is not learning the method again. It is executing it the same way twice.
- Week 1
You install the lens instead of re-watching the course
Pick the pack that matches the methodology you already follow. Your charts start being graded against those rules rather than against a generic model that has never heard of killzones.Learn the underlying concepts first - Day 4
A setup you would have taken gets capped
The chart looked right. The rulebook says it was 40 minutes outside the session window, and the grade falls to a C. You skip it. This is the entire value of codification and it feels like nothing at the time. - Week 3
You find out which rule you keep breaking
The journal separates trades where you followed the pack from trades where you overrode it. Most traders discover they break the same rule repeatedly, and that it is not the one they assumed. - Month 2
The pack earns its place, or it does not
Your own expectancy under the pack is now a number. If following it beats overriding it, keep it. If it does not, that is information most traders never get about the methodology they have organised their year around.How the scoring works
Notice what this loop does not require: believing anyone. It requires following a rulebook exactly for long enough to measure it.
Every pack has one
We publish how each methodology performs when its rules are followed exactly. Nobody else will, because most of them are selling the methodology. Right now every row is empty — that is what day one of an honest scoreboard looks like.
| Pack | Tier | n | Expectancy | A-grade hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TJR AI 8 rules | Official | — | collecting | — |
ICT AI 8 rules | Official | — | collecting | — |
Mark Minervini AI 8 rules | Official | — | collecting | — |
Qullamaggie AI 7 rules | Official | — | collecting | — |
Al Brooks AI 7 rules | Official | — | collecting | — |
A row fills in when 500 setups graded under that pack have resolved — and it fills in whichever way it lands. When one of these reads negative it stays listed, in the same table, in the same size type. A marketplace that hides its losers is hiding something. The alternative, which is what most of this industry does, is to print a number before there is anything behind it.
How a methodology becomes a rulebook
The disciple's real question is not whether it works. It is whether this is actually his strategy.
Source
Rules are extracted only from public teaching — videos, streams, published material. Every rule stores the timestamp it came from.
Codify
Each rule is classified as a hard rule, a weighted confluence, or a manual confirm. Anything requiring discretion becomes a manual confirm rather than a guess.
Review
Traders who follow the methodology check the codification for fidelity. Disputes are public and resolved before a pack leaves Community tier.
Version
Packs carry a version. Updating one never retroactively regrades past setups — your record stays the record of what you actually traded.
Score
From publication, every setup graded under the pack feeds its scoreboard. No pack ships with a track record it did not earn on ORIN.
Your strategy, measurable
An official pack carries your verification badge, is codified with you rather than from you, and publishes the same scoreboard as every other pack. If your method works, this is the only place on the internet that can prove it with a number.
What the packs have actually returned
Filtered to this context: not overall platform accuracy, but per-pack performance when the rules were followed exactly.
Three of these four are empty, and the page said so before you scrolled to it. The last one is the figure that matters most to you and it is the one we cannot fill in from our side — it is built from your decisions, not ours, and it appears in your Edge view once you have resolved trades under a pack.
How the calibration worksWhat a pack plugs into
A rulebook is a lens over the engine. These are the parts it changes.
Smart Money Concepts
The concepts most packs are built from — learn them on a real chart before installing a rulebook that assumes them.
smart money conceptsConfluence Engine
The scoring a pack overrides. Hard rules cap the grade; confluences reweight it.
confluence engineLive AI Studio
Where you actually apply the lens — chart, rule checklist and plan on one screen.
Live AI StudioA pack is rules, not the guru
Codification captures what can be written down. That is genuinely less than what a good trader does, and pretending otherwise would be the same mythology this page exists to referee.
Discretion does not codify
Experience, narrative and the judgement calls a trader makes in the moment cannot be turned into a checkable rule. Manual-confirm items exist precisely because some things have to stay yours.
A pack is a reading of the teaching
Two careful people can codify the same methodology differently. That is why every rule cites its source and why fidelity review is public — so you can disagree with a specific rule rather than the whole pack.
A scoreboard is not a verdict on a person
The numbers describe how a codified pack performed on ORIN over a sample. They are not a judgement on any educator, and a pack reading badly may mean the codification is wrong rather than the method.
Small samples lie confidently
A pack with 400 resolved setups can show anything. The gallery marks those as collecting data instead of publishing a number that would be indistinguishable from noise.
If you want the concepts before the rulebook, start with smart money concepts. If you trade a funded account, the packs that matter most are the ones that encode your firm's limits — that page is here.
Questions traders actually ask
A trading methodology written out as rules ORIN can check — hard rules that cap the grade when broken, weighted confluences, and manual-confirm items you verify yourself. Applying one changes the lens your chart is graded through, so the same setup can score differently under different rulebooks.
Only where the badge says so. Community packs are built from public teaching and carry an explicit "inspired by, not affiliated" line. Reviewed packs have been checked for fidelity by traders who follow that methodology. Official packs are built with the educator directly, and only those claim endorsement.
Every rule links the public source it came from, down to the video timestamp, so you can check it yourself. Packs are versioned, fidelity disputes are handled by community review, and past grades are never retroactively changed when a pack is updated.
That is the point of the scoreboard. Each pack publishes sample size, expectancy and A-grade hit rate from setups graded under its rules — published whichever way it lands. The numbers describe how the codified pack performs on ORIN, not a verdict on any educator.
Yes. Fork any pack, change the rules, and your version gets its own scoreboard from that point forward — it does not inherit the original's record. You can also codify your own rules from scratch without starting from anyone else's.
An official pack is built with you, carries your verification badge, and publishes the same scoreboard as everyone else. The terms are the same for all packs: we do not suppress a record because it reads badly, and that condition is not negotiable.