A breakout retest waits for price to break a level, then enters when price returns to that broken level and holds it. It trades fewer opportunities than the breakout itself in exchange for a defined invalidation and a materially better entry price.
- 1Break of the level
- 2Return to it — and it holds
What the engine actually checks
“Looks like one” is not a rule. Detection requires every hard criterion and scores the confluences — fail a hard criterion and it is not this setup, it is a hope with a nickname.
Hard criteria — all required
- ▪A level with at least two prior touches — a line through one point is not a level.
- ▪A candle close beyond it, not a wick.
- ▪A return to within a defined tolerance of the level without closing back through it.
Confluences — weighted, not required
- ▫The break occurring on expanding volume and the retest on contracting volume.
- ▫The retest arriving within a reasonable bar count — a return three weeks later is a new situation.
- ▫Higher-timeframe trend agreeing with the break direction.
Trading it
- 1Where you are wrongA close back through the level. This is the entire argument for the setup: the invalidation is one level away and unambiguous, where a breakout entry has to choose between a stop inside the noise and a stop far below the entry.
- 2EntryOn the reaction at the retested level — a rejection candle, or simply a hold and continuation. Setting a passive limit order at the level is the alternative and accepts fills on retests that were about to fail.
- 3ObjectiveThe next structural level in the break direction. Because the entry is close to the invalidation, this setup produces good risk-to-reward on objectives that would be unattractive from a breakout entry — which is the whole point of waiting.
Worked example — real numbers
entry on the retest hold, stop below the broken level, target at the next structural high. A valid formation offering under about 1.5R is still a valid formation and still not worth taking — valid and worth it are different questions.
Size this trade against your account →The scoreboard
Resolution by grade, market and timeframe — because a single blended number would let strong contexts carry weak ones, which is how every invented “success rate” in this category is constructed.
| Grade | Market | Timeframe | Resolution | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Equities | 1H–4H | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| A | Equities | 1D | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| A | Crypto | 1H–4H | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| A | Crypto | 1D | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| A | FX | 1H–4H | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| A | FX | 1D | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| B | Equities | 1H–4H | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| B | Equities | 1D | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| B | Crypto | 1H–4H | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| B | Crypto | 1D | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| B | FX | 1H–4H | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| B | FX | 1D | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| C | Equities | 1H–4H | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| C | Equities | 1D | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| C | Crypto | 1H–4H | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| C | Crypto | 1D | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| C | FX | 1H–4H | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
| C | FX | 1D | collecting | no resolved sample yet |
Where this traps people
Breakout Retest vs Trading the breakout directly
The breakout entry never misses a move and pays for it with a worse average price and an awkward stop. The retest entry gets a defined invalidation and misses everything that does not look back. Neither is superior in the abstract — they differ in hit rate versus reward per trade, and the scoreboard is where that gets settled with numbers rather than preferences.
Drop your chart and the engine checks it against the same hard criteria listed above — the ones it uses on every scan. First read is free and needs no account.
Questions traders actually ask
- What is a breakout retest?
- Entering after price breaks a level and then returns to it and holds. The broken level becomes the invalidation, which gives the trade a tight, unambiguous stop — the main advantage over entering on the break itself.
- How long should you wait for a retest?
- Within a reasonable number of bars on the timeframe you are trading — hours on an intraday chart, days on a daily. A return weeks later is a new situation that happens to occur at the same price, not a retest of that break.
- What if the retest never happens?
- You miss the trade, and that is the accepted cost of the method rather than a problem to solve. Chasing after deciding to wait is the worst of both approaches: the breakout's bad entry with the retest trader's hesitation priced in.
- Is the retest more reliable than the breakout?
- It has a better reward-to-risk per trade because the stop is tighter, and a lower hit rate in the sense that many valid breaks never offer the entry. Which is preferable depends on your sizing, and the scoreboard splits them rather than declaring a winner.
- Does volume matter on the retest?
- Contracting volume into the retest is the constructive version — sellers are not pressing, price is simply drifting back. Heavy volume on the return frequently precedes a failed break rather than a successful retest.
Related setups
Learn it · scan for it
More in Strategies
Find a breakout retest on your own chart
The criteria above are the ones the engine runs. Point it at a symbol you care about and see whether what you are looking at actually qualifies — free, and without an account.
Grade a chart free